Buy on Amazon
CA$250
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $219
Availability
MSRP in USD: $219
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $380
Availability
MSRP in USD: $380
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 1443 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 1% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-4800MQ - 127 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 47 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
127
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.97/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$250
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 65W AM4 Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler (YD1600BBAFBOX)
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 47 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
