Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 1115 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i3-10300 - CA$89.0 vs CA$132.31
- Up to 19% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i3-10300 - CA$0.46 vs CA$0.57 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 19% better in F1 23 than Ryzen 5 1600 - 232 vs 195 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
195
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
232
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.57/FPS
80%
Price, CA$
CA$132.31
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$132.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |