Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8840U outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8840U is 2430 days newer than Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
- Performs up to 4% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen 5 1600 - 240 vs 231 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 28 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
231
96.25%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.08/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$250
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58287 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
1068
42.6517571884984%
Multi-Core
4578
52.23642172523961%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8840U |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Not Available |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 28 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
Yes | Overclockable | No |