Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms Ryzen 3 4300U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 435 days newer than Ryzen 3 4300U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 3 4300U - 205 vs 184 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 4300U - 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
205
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.24/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$255
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$255 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Renoir | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Radeon Graphics 320SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |