Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 729 days newer than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 22% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen 3 3250U - 197 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 20 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
197
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.72/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$339
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |