Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 115 days newer than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 17% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 3250U - 111 vs 95 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 16 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
111
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.38/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$375.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$375.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60979 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Single-Core
748
46.40198511166253%
Multi-Core
1447
20.01106347669755%
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |