Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 435 days newer than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 39% better in Rust than Ryzen 3 3250U - 231 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 12 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
231
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$290.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$290.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13936 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |