Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900T outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900T is 75 days older than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Performs up to 15% better in F1 23 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 222 vs 193 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 16 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
193
86.93693693693693%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$144
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$144 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3683 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
73.41242149337054%
Multi-Core
3013
50.26693360026694%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i9-9900T |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |