Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1285 days newer than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 88% better in War Thunder than Ryzen 3 3200G - 301 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 32 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for CA$144 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
33.88083735909822%
Multi-Core
3013
13.800210690239545%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |