Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i3-10300 - CA$154.43 vs CA$172.99
- Up to 9% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i3-10300 - CA$0.72 vs CA$0.79 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Ryzen 3 3200G - 218 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
214
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$154.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$154.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
218
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.79/FPS
91%
Price, CA$
CA$172.99
89%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$172.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |