Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 696 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$133.07 vs CA$1393.07
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 1% better in Metro Exodus than Ryzen 3 3200G - 143 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 32 vs 4 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for CA$133.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76777 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
143
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1393.07
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,393.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76777 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
89.83774551665243%
Multi-Core
3013
39.96551266746253%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Picasso | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |