Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 141 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 84% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - CA$142.95 vs CA$895.0
- Up to 83% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 9 3950X - CA$0.86 vs CA$4.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 10% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 3 3200G - 182 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 32 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
166
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$142.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$142.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5713 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
182
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.92/FPS
17%
Price, CA$
CA$895
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$895 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5713 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Picasso | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |