Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 1207 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 4% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-7400T - 296 vs 285 FPS
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i5-7400T - CA$180.0 vs CA$250.0
- Up to 31% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-7400T - CA$0.61 vs CA$0.88 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
296
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$180
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18018 minutes ago
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18018 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Matisse | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |