Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Ryzen 3 2300X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1585 days newer than Ryzen 3 2300X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2300X
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 45% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Ryzen 3 2300X - 285 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2300X - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 2300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Ryzen 3 2300X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 2300X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1205
38.808373590982285%
Multi-Core
3304
15.133055466495671%
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
