Buy on Amazon
CA$499
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200U outperforms Core i7-3930K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200U is 2247 days newer than Core i7-3930K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-3930K - 174 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 15 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200U - 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i7-3930K
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
170
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.94/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$499
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-3930K Hexa-Core Processor 3.2 Ghz 12 MB Cache LGA 2011 - BX80619I73930K
Buy for CA$499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 287 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen 3 2200U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2018
Core i7-3930K
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U | vs | Intel Core i7-3930K |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
