Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200U outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200U is 2280 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than FX-4100 - 200 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 3 2200U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2018
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Radeon Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
