Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 1509 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 21% better in War Thunder than Core i3-3250 - 162 vs 134 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1300X doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Ryzen 3 1300X
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Core i3-3250
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
