Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 1200 is 1053 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 161 vs 160 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 20 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
161
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.42/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$549.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$549.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61759 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
886
90.04065040650406%
Multi-Core
5378
100%
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |