Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 3842 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 14% better in Valorant than Phenom X4 9650 - 761 vs 667 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 24 vs 4 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
761
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.95/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$726.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$726.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Agena | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |