Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3930K outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3930K is 1327 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Phenom X4 9550 - 225 vs 219 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 12 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
225
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$499.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$499.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
38.613861386138616%
Multi-Core
712
24.045930428909152%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i7-3930K |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
Agena | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 130 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |