Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 4255 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 13% better in Minecraft than Phenom X4 9550 - 656 vs 578 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
24.45141065830721%
Multi-Core
712
36.050632911392405%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Athlon |
| Agena | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
