Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 4255 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 8% better in No Man's Sky than Phenom X4 9550 - 166 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 35 vs 95 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Athlon |
| Agena | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
