Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 4560 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 75% better in Dirt 5 than Phenom II X4 925 - 235 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 16 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
235
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.99/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$232.38
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$232.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
12.944983818770226%
Multi-Core
930
7.726819541375872%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Deneb | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |