Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 4082 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 9% better in Halo Infinite than Phenom II X4 925 - 164 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 32 vs 4 threads
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
164
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$10.98/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1800
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,800 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4990 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
19.09307875894988%
Multi-Core
930
7.528535578402007%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Deneb | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 280 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |