Key Differences
In short — Phenom II X4 925 outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Phenom II X4 925 is 410 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Performs up to 2% better in Starfield than Phenom X4 9650 - 42 vs 41 FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | AMD Phenom X4 9650 |
|---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 27th, 2008 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | Phenom X4 |
| Deneb | Codename | Agena |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM2+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 65 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 11.5x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
