Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2971 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 13% better in HITMAN 2 than Phenom II X4 925 - 121 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 64 vs 4 threads
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | EPYC |
Deneb | Codename | Naples |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |