Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 2983 days newer than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 810
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 5% better in Halo Infinite than Phenom II X4 810 - 157 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 12 vs 4 threads
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
157
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$250
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 810 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Feb 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Deneb | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |