Key Differences
In short — FX-8150 outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8150 is 975 days newer than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 810
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Performs up to 1% better in Rocket League than Phenom II X4 810 - 672 vs 667 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 8 vs 4 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
672
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 810 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Feb 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | FX |
Deneb | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |