Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3250 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3250 is 636 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Performs up to 2% better in Ready or Not than FX-8350 - 239 vs 235 FPS
- Up to 34% cheaper than FX-8350 - CA$120.0 vs CA$182.45
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76812 minutes ago
Buy for CA$120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76812 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Pentium |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |