Buy on Amazon
CA$209.7
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10940X outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10940X is 2552 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-10940X - CA$209.7 vs CA$614.99
- Up to 65% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i9-10940X - CA$0.99 vs CA$2.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10940X - 125 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10940X
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than FX-8350 - 218 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 28 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
211
96.78899082568807%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.99/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$209.7
100%
Value Winner
AMD FD8350FRHKBOX FX-8350 FX-Series 8-Core Black Edition
Buy for CA$209.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Core i9-10940X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
218
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.82/FPS
35.1063829787234%
Price, CA$
CA$614.99
34%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10940X Desktop Processor 14 Cores up to 4.8GHz Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W, BX8069510940X
Buy for CA$614.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Core i9-10940X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i9-10940X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
| Vishera | Codename | Cascade Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 14 |
| 8 | Threads | 28 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
