Buy on Amazon
CA$789
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 3415 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 51% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-8320E - 163 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel Core i9-14900 Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) up to 5.8 GHz
Buy for CA$789 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i9-14900
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| FX | Collection | Core i9 |
| Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
