Buy on Amazon
CA$98.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670K outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670K is 457 days older than FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Performs up to 9% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than FX-8320E - 244 vs 223 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 84 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel Core i5-4670K Quad-Core Desktop Processor 3.4 GHZ 6 MB Cache - BX80646I54670K
Buy for CA$98.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65455 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i5-4670K
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i5-4670K |
|---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 84 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
