Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is 2149 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
- Performs up to 9% better in DOOM Eternal than FX-8320E - 490 vs 450 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Vishera | Codename | Not Available |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
