Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700KF is 4011 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-14700KF - CA$111.14 vs CA$517.99
- Up to 20% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i7-14700KF - CA$1.18 vs CA$1.48 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700KF
- Performs up to 271% better in Diablo IV than FX-8320 - 349 vs 94 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 28 vs 8 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
94
26%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$111.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$111.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7289 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
349
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.48/FPS
79%
Price, CA$
CA$517.99
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$517.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7299 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |