Buy on Amazon
CA$111.14
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600 is 2187 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i5-9600 - CA$111.14 vs CA$209.01
- Up to 39% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i5-9600 - CA$0.54 vs CA$0.88 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600
- Performs up to 16% better in Sea of Thieves than FX-8320 - 237 vs 204 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
204
86.07594936708861%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$111.14
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-8320 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.5 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for CA$111.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Core i5-9600
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
237
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.88/FPS
61.36363636363637%
Price, CA$
CA$209.01
53%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-9600 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.6 GHz LGA1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for CA$209.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Core i5-9600
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
