Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 2589 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - CA$111.14 vs CA$1348.42
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 11% better in F1 22 than FX-8320 - 280 vs 252 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 32 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for CA$111.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76350 minutes ago
Buy for CA$1,348.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76351 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |