Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2814 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - CA$83.46 vs CA$728.41
- Up to 88% better value when playing Deathloop than Ryzen 9 3900XT - CA$0.5 vs CA$4.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 8% better in Deathloop than FX-8300 - 182 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 24 vs 8 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
168
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4/FPS
12%
Price, CA$
CA$728.41
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$728.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |