Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 3619 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 18% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-8150 - 182 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
154
84.61538461538461%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$93.19
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$93.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58282 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2388G |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Xeon E |
Zambezi | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P750 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |