Buy on Amazon
CA$87.12
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - CA$87.12 vs CA$699.84
- Up to 84% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-10900K - CA$0.49 vs CA$3.14 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 25% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than FX-8150 - 223 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
178
79%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-8150 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.6 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
223
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.14/FPS
15%
Price, CA$
CA$699.84
12%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900K Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.3 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W
Buy for CA$699.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| FX | Collection | Core i9 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
