Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 3191 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - CA$93.19 vs CA$642.17
- Up to 82% better value when playing Minecraft than Ryzen 9 3900XT - CA$0.16 vs CA$0.88 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 22% better in Minecraft than FX-8150 - 728 vs 597 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 24 vs 8 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
597
82%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$93.19
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$93.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8140 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
728
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.88/FPS
18%
Price, CA$
CA$642.17
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$642.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |