Key Differences
In short — FX-8120 outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8120 is 377 days older than FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
149
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18741 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
AMD FX-8120 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Zambezi | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |