Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1595 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 125 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 27% better in Dirt 5 than FX-6350 - 179 vs 141 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 24 vs 6 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for CA$600.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76516 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |