Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2364 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 125 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 8% better in Rocket League than FX-6350 - 725 vs 674 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 20 vs 6 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Buy for CA$452.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76497 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Vishera | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |