Buy on Amazon
CA$675.98
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2558 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 24% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-6350 - 134 vs 108 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 20 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel Core i9-10900 Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for CA$675.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76375 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| FX | Collection | Core i9 |
| Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 10 |
| 6 | Threads | 20 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
