Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Core i7-940 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 1624 days newer than Core i7-940.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-940 - 125 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Core i7-940
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-940
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Single-Core
447
91.59836065573771%
Multi-Core
1532
98.45758354755783%
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i7-940 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Vishera | Codename | Bloomfield |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 130 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
