Buy on Amazon
CA$565
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $524
Availability
MSRP in USD: $524
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3964 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 16% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than FX-6200 - 134 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 32 vs 6 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
134
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$565
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-13900F Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36MB Cache, up to 5.6 GHz
Buy for CA$565 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10750 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| FX | Collection | Core i9 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 3 | Cores | 24 |
| 6 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
