Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2612 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 14% better in Remnant II than FX-6200 - 89 vs 78 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
89
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.58/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$318.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$318.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |