Key Differences
In short — FX-6300 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6300 is 239 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than FX-6200 - 252 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
252
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$59.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Zambezi | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |