Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4102 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$99.02 vs CA$1952.53
- Up to 95% better value when playing Stray than Core i5-13400F - CA$0.57 vs CA$10.39 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Stray than FX-6100 - 188 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 16 vs 6 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
175
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$99.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$99.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 226 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
188
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$10.39/FPS
5%
Price, CA$
CA$1952.53
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,952.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 225 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |