Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1345 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 22 than FX-4350 - 256 vs 252 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
