Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 3360 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - CA$36.09 vs CA$339.0
- Up to 86% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-12700F - CA$0.24 vs CA$1.7 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 32% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-4300 - 199 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 20 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
151
75%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12869 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
199
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.7/FPS
14%
Price, CA$
CA$339
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12869 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |